Eric Paddon wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 5:20 pm "Indy, you were supposed to keep your eyes CLOSED!"

"Having my face melted off is better than doing another one of these, doll."

AndyDursin wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 11:56 am A Sydney Sweeney SPIDER-WOMAN movie might have worked but it's too bad they blew it already with this one!

Just keep the stripper outfit from Madame Web...!

Can't wait for KRAVEN THE HUNTER

Shame that's gonna pull down a good filmmaker, J.C. Chandor, with it.

It must be amazing working for a corporation that by embracing DEI they can use it a shield for criticism, including lousy writing, direction and performances. :x Too bad all of this diversity, equality and inclusion is costing them billions in box office, merchandise sales and at their parks. :P

I'm almost tempted to watch this a second time, just to laugh at it.

AndyDursin wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2024 1:02 pm What round of reshoots is this? The 2nd or 3rd?

This is gonna end up costing $500 million when it's all done, and it'll STILL be terrible despite Disney's frantic attempts to "fix" what was gravely flawed on a basic screenplay level from the start.

Hey, it's Pam Grier...!

https://www.vulture.com/article/reacher ... _source=tw

God forbid these people ever encounter ACTUAL racism in their lives.

Again, you get boxed in as a 'sexist' for saying this, but in the last 10-15 years, how many franchises with a male lead have been resurrected with a gender swap? And why? MAD MAX, STAR WARS, PREDATOR, EVIL DEAD, GHOSTBUSTERS, etc. And it's not about "equity," it's entirely about $$$. Try...

The one "legacy sequel" comeback we all wanted...

Crying shame. Furiosa was magnificent.