Page 1 of 1

Box Office Weekend 9/27: Is it Me or...

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 12:27 pm
by AndyDursin
...there's nothing out there? Like, nothing at all I want to see.

Usually September brings some more adult oriented fare...but this year has been pathetic.

Numbers for the weekend. Good news for Sony's animated CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF MEATBALLS and terrible news for everything else. Too bad about SURROGATES but when i saw the running time was chopped to under 90 minutes you knew it was DOA.

1. Meatballs (Sony) Week 2, Wkd $24.6M (-19%), [3,119] Cume $60M
2. Surrogates (Disney) NEW, Wkd $15M [2,951]
3. Fame (MGM) NEW, Wkd $10M [3,096]
4. The Informant (WB) Week 2, Wkd $6.9M (-34%) [2,505] Cume $20.9M
5. I Can Do Bad All By Myself (LG) Week 3, Wkd $4.7M [2,120] Cume $44.5M
6. Pandorum (Overture) NEW, Wkd $4.4M [2,506]

Re: Box Office Weekend 9/27: Is it Me or...

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:23 pm
by Eric W.
AndyDursin wrote:...there's nothing out there? Like, nothing at all I want to see.
Many, many weeks I've been saying the same thing. Heck no it's not just you and not even close.

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:19 pm
by AndyDursin
Full numbers...

1 1 Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs Sony $24,600,000 -18.8% 3,119 - $7,887 $60,036,000 $100 2
2 N Surrogates BV $15,000,000 - 2,951 - $5,083 $15,000,000 $80 1
3 N Fame (2009) MGM $10,033,000 - 3,096 - $3,241 $10,033,000 $18 1
4 2 The Informant! WB $6,915,000 -33.9% 2,505 - $2,760 $20,992,000 $22 2
5 3 Tyler Perry's I Can Do Bad All By Myself LGF $4,750,000 -51.9% 2,120 -135 $2,241 $44,543,000 - 3
6 N Pandorum Over. $4,408,000 - 2,506 - $1,759 $4,408,000 $40 1
7 4 Love Happens Uni. $4,327,000 -46.3% 1,898 - $2,280 $14,728,000 $18 2
8 5 Jennifer's Body Fox $3,500,000 -49.0% 2,738 +36 $1,278 $12,306,000 $16 2
9 6 9 Focus $2,832,000 -49.1% 2,025 -35 $1,399 $27,101,000 $30 3
10 7 Inglourious Basterds Wein. $2,722,000 -28.7% 1,960 -559 $1,389 $114,460,000 $70 6
11 8 All About Steve Fox $2,300,000 -31.8% 1,965 -194 $1,170 $29,954,000 - 4
12 12 Julie & Julia Sony $1,200,000 -37.3% 1,328 -675 $904 $90,537,000 $40 8

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:34 pm
by mkaroly
I haven't been to a movie theater in months. There is absolutely nothing Hollywood is putting out that I want to see. I couldn't even tell you the plot of any of the movies listed below.

Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:42 am
by Eric W.
mkaroly wrote:I haven't been to a movie theater in months. There is absolutely nothing Hollywood is putting out that I want to see. I couldn't even tell you the plot of any of the movies listed below.
As an obvious corrollary: When Hollywood is just putting out some much junk en masse...is it any wonder film music has died right along with it?

Who is going to bother coming up with even decent music and/or how do you even do it for tripe like that lineup is?

Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 11:59 am
by mkaroly
Eric W. wrote:
mkaroly wrote:I haven't been to a movie theater in months. There is absolutely nothing Hollywood is putting out that I want to see. I couldn't even tell you the plot of any of the movies listed below.
As an obvious corrollary: When Hollywood is just putting out some much junk en masse...is it any wonder film music has died right along with it?

Who is going to bother coming up with even decent music and/or how do you even do it for tripe like that lineup is?
Excellent point!

Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:06 pm
by Monterey Jack
Eric W. wrote:As an obvious corrollary: When Hollywood is just putting out some much junk en masse...is it any wonder film music has died right along with it?
Tell that to Jerry Goldsmith, who was writing virtual symphonies for crap 70's movies like The Swarm and Damnation Alley.

Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:47 am
by Eric W.
Monterey Jack wrote:
Eric W. wrote:As an obvious corrollary: When Hollywood is just putting out some much junk en masse...is it any wonder film music has died right along with it?
Tell that to Jerry Goldsmith, who was writing virtual symphonies for crap 70's movies like The Swarm and Damnation Alley.

Yes, but I think even he'd have problems scoring the bulk of the dreck that Hollywood puts out today.

Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:52 pm
by romanD
whats wrong with a 90min film? In the 80ies a film with running 2 hours was already regarded extended lenght... I enjoy a lean 90min film a lot more, very difficult to get bored during that duration than in a bloated 3 hours film like POTC 3 or TRANSFORMERS 2 (latter had not even enough plot and characters for 90min!)...