Pulp Fiction
It's hard to believe this film is nearly 20 years old, and I suppose harder still for me to believe I have never actually sat down to watch it until now!
I'm not a big fan of the other Tarantino films I've seen, but I have to be honest -- I actually found Pulp Fiction very watchable, and am forced to admit it works extremely well.
I find Tarantino an odd bird, a sort of "half-genius" -- a man with an unique gift for arresting dialog and eccentric characters, yet at the same time unable to write a smooth, cohesive narrative arc. There's an originality to his overall style, yet many of the sequences in his films are extremely derivative of older movies. Ironically, despite its non-linear construction and use of vignettes, Pulp Fiction is actually the most cohesive Tarantino screenplay I've seen so far.
The acting in this film is unquestionably great, and the entire cast take Taratino's crackling dialog and run with it. More than anyone else, this film really belongs to Samuel L. Jackson, who gives one of his best performances and emerges as the real star of the movie. Jackson really makes the film for me. But I strongly suspect the final cut of Pulp Fiction differs from what was originally written. It wouldn't surprise me if the Bruce Willis segment was intended to be the final story, but Jackson's performance was so strong, it was decided the diner scene should conclude the film. I can't deny that was the best way to end the movie...but it does seem odd to see John Travolta in the final vignette when he was already killed by Willis a half-hour earlier!
And not all the segments work perfectly. The sequence with Harvey Keitel, though mildly amusing, is an awkward fit, while the scene with Christopher Walken is dead weight (but impossible to cut-out because it establishes the importance of Willis' watch).
There's no question the film is thoroughly disgusting at times (the pawn shop scene in particular) but it is less disgusting to my mind than Kill Bill, Death Proof and Inglorious Basterds. There's a raw energy to Pulp Fiction that is undeniably compelling, and it showcases all of Taratino's strengths but few of his weaknesses. This being his second film, he is deciedly less self-indulgent than in his later movies (there are no boring twenty-minute dialog scenes or long, gratuitous close-ups of feet).
Aesthetically, I'm about as far away from Tarantino as one can get. But I can't deny Pulp Fiction -- while often grisly and disturbing -- is a genuinely compelling film. It's a little derivative (the dictionary title card that opens the film is from the Blade Runner "workprint", while the pawn shop assault is right out of Deliverance), but overall Pulp Fiction is some of Taratino's most original work that I've seen. The film stays with you for some time afterward, which unfortunately isn't the most pleasant feeling. But at the same time I have to admit its lingering effect is a testament to its dramatic potency.
