EDIT: Wait, it's just a one-off showing of the original, not the sequel.
Still, dumb.M3gan 2.0, with horrid gimmick included!
-
Monterey Jack
- Posts: 10544
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
- Location: Walpole, MA
M3gan 2.0, with horrid gimmick included!
Yeah, THIS is the way to get people back in theaters again...!
EDIT: Wait, it's just a one-off showing of the original, not the sequel. Still, dumb.
EDIT: Wait, it's just a one-off showing of the original, not the sequel.
Still, dumb.-
Monterey Jack
- Posts: 10544
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
- Location: Walpole, MA
Re: M3gan 2.0, with horrid gimmick included!
$10 million opening weekend, for a movie that cost over twice what the first one did and made $30 million on its opening weekend. 
Whose bright idea was to make an action sequel to a January horror movie and dump it in theaters the same day as F1?
Whose bright idea was to make an action sequel to a January horror movie and dump it in theaters the same day as F1?
-
AndyDursin
- Posts: 35758
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:45 pm
- Location: RI
Re: M3gan 2.0, with horrid gimmick included!
Are you really surprised though? That's so poor that it shows there was no audience appetite for the movie, period. Just because the first one did OK doesn't mean audiences wanted to pay money to see it again.
I mean, the first one had a couple of chuckles but there was no need of making another one from a creative standpoint. This had "wait for Peacock" written all over it.
I mean, the first one had a couple of chuckles but there was no need of making another one from a creative standpoint. This had "wait for Peacock" written all over it.