Best unintentionally hilarious movie ever?

Talk about the latest movies and video releases here!
Message
Author
TomServo
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 12:57 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#16 Post by TomServo »

What the hell has been up with Nicholas Cage's roles in the past few years? Many of the films have not even been screened for the critics. Dude, get a new agent!

Eric W.
Posts: 7685
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 2:04 pm

#17 Post by Eric W. »

TomServo wrote:What the hell has been up with Nicholas Cage's roles in the past few years? Many of the films have not even been screened for the critics. Dude, get a new agent!
Seriously.

User avatar
Edmund Kattak
Posts: 1825
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:08 pm
Location: Northern New Jersey
Contact:

#18 Post by Edmund Kattak »

Andy/Monterey Jack,

Every other scene had Nick Cage either punching or drop-kicking women into walls. Heck, I lost my dinner when I saw him in the Bear suit showing up to the coven of nut-jobs.

And the one shot of him running down to the dock, then seeing the girl in the water; him rushing intgo the water and pulling her out. His hackneyed attempt at emotion on his face, with a sudden 60's style pull back of the camera.

Ooof.

Regards,
Ed
Indeed,
Ed

User avatar
Edmund Kattak
Posts: 1825
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:08 pm
Location: Northern New Jersey
Contact:

#19 Post by Edmund Kattak »

AndyDursin wrote:LOL. I have this feeling the new WICKER MAN is only going to rise with time as an all-time favorite. I didn't think it was as funny as John Frankenheimer's PROPHECY -- which is one of my all-time unintentional hoots as Paul knows -- but as modern duds go it's at the VERY top of the list.
It will be a cult classic, because you'll have to be in a cult to like it.

This isn't even STAR TREK V - THE FINAL FRONTIER bad, as that movie at least doesn't take itself too seriously. WICKER MAN, however, takes itself so seriously that NOMADS with Pierce Brosnan is Oscar material, by comparison.

Regards,
Ed
Indeed,
Ed

User avatar
Monterey Jack
Posts: 10561
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
Location: Walpole, MA

#20 Post by Monterey Jack »

It's a sad state of affairs when Cage's one-line cameo in Grindhouse represented the best work he's done in years.


User avatar
Paul MacLean
Posts: 7540
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: New York

#21 Post by Paul MacLean »

This was almost as funny as Born on the Forth of July (and only slightly less silly)...



Unbelievably, John Barry scored this instead of scoring The Spy Who Loved Me!

User avatar
AndyDursin
Posts: 35777
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:45 pm
Location: RI

#22 Post by AndyDursin »

I need to find a good DVD of that, lol. Most of the US releases are public domain "specials" ;)

User avatar
Edmund Kattak
Posts: 1825
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:08 pm
Location: Northern New Jersey
Contact:

#23 Post by Edmund Kattak »

Paul MacLean wrote:This was almost as funny as Born on the Forth of July (and only slightly less silly)...



Unbelievably, John Barry scored this instead of scoring The Spy Who Loved Me!

Ooof. that was horrible!!!!
Indeed,
Ed

User avatar
Edmund Kattak
Posts: 1825
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:08 pm
Location: Northern New Jersey
Contact:

#24 Post by Edmund Kattak »

Monterey Jack wrote:"Step AWAY from the bike!"

"What is that, what is that...?! Oh, no, not the bees...! AGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH, THEY'RE IN MY EYES! AHHHHHHHHHHHGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!! AGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG-GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG-HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH-HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH-!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Cage ninja-kicking Leelee Sobieski gave me the biggest belly laugh I've had in years. :lol:
Yeah. What in the hell was all that about?What were they thinking? What could they think the audience reaction would be? Feminists would have gotten pissed at that, or, people would have just laughed uncontrollobly at the absurdity of it all! The desired effect was TOTALLy missed there, if anyone were to read that in the context of the film.
Indeed,
Ed

User avatar
AndyDursin
Posts: 35777
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:45 pm
Location: RI

#25 Post by AndyDursin »

Edmund Kattak wrote:Yeah. What in the hell was all that about?What were they thinking? What could they think the audience reaction would be? Feminists would have gotten pissed at that, or, people would have just laughed uncontrollobly at the absurdity of it all! The desired effect was TOTALLy missed there, if anyone were to read that in the context of the film.
I may be burned at the stake for this but the original WICKER MAN is a very overrated movie on its own terms. Yes it has a certain mood, a measured performance from Edward Woodward, and a lot of atmosphere -- but in terms of a story, and filmmaking prowess, it's pretty crude and basic. Paul Maclean and I watched the movie back in January together and laughed at a lot of it...it certainly isn't scary or suspenseful, and those musical numbers? What the heck??!

I'm not saying I didn't enjoy it (or seeing Britt Ekland dance around nude), but it definitely is NOT a "classic" film in my estimation. It was a movie of the moment, and I think a lot of its notoreity and "shock value" had to do with its ending, which these days isn't anything earth shattering.

As far as so many '70s horror favorites go, like THE EXORCIST, it doesn't hold a candle to them.

The remake just made it all more absurd, and Cage's performance was just so haywire, instead of being horrified at the end it was a good time to laugh :)

User avatar
Paul MacLean
Posts: 7540
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: New York

#26 Post by Paul MacLean »

Edmund Kattak wrote:What could they think the audience reaction would be? Feminists would have gotten pissed at that, or, people would have just laughed uncontrollobly at the absurdity of it all!
From my perspective, the only positive aspect of the Wicker Man remake was its defamatory portrayal of the "womyns" culture, and the sinister, narcissistic, man-hating mindset which fuels radical wiccan feminism. I had an ex-girlfriend who got really messed-up by that stuff. That was the one thing which the Wicker Man remake really nailed. Otherwise the film is a laughable waste of time!
AndyDursin wrote: I may be burned at the stake for this but the original WICKER MAN is a very overrated movie on its own terms. Yes it has a certain mood, a measured performance from Edward Woodward, and a lot of atmosphere -- but in terms of a story, and filmmaking prowess, it's pretty crude and basic. Paul Maclean and I watched the movie back in January together and laughed at a lot of it...it certainly isn't scary or suspenseful, and those musical numbers? What the heck??!
"And on on that tree, there was an egg, and in that egg, there was a man..." :lol:

The while film looked like a 70s British TV movie, like 16mm location footage from Doctor Who. A good score would have helped, too (did The Wicker Man even have a score?).
The remake just made it all more absurd, and Cage's performance was just so haywire, instead of being horrified at the end it was a good time to laugh :)
"My legs! You broke my legs!" :roll:

User avatar
Monterey Jack
Posts: 10561
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
Location: Walpole, MA

#27 Post by Monterey Jack »

Paul MacLean wrote:"My legs! You broke my legs!" :roll:
"And you're doing it for nothing! Killing me won't bring back your Goddamn honey!"

Post Reply