Page 4 of 10
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2022 12:40 am
by Monterey Jack
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2022 8:35 am
by AndyDursin
Absolutely atrocious -- someone got PAID to do that? And it has nothing to do with the aesthetic of the film...literally nothing. If the artist wanted to design something that looked like an old Atari cartridge (which plays prominently in the plot) that'd be one thing -- but that's not at all what it looks like.
Bought it anyway though. One of the higher class titles that label has ever released!
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2022 11:58 am
by Monterey Jack
Bury it deep.
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2022 12:29 pm
by AndyDursin
I saw that one this morning, rubbed my eyes in disbelief. Doesn't even look like anything in the movie much less its original ad campaign.
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2022 1:40 pm
by Monterey Jack
At least the Arrow release made the Graboid somewhat resemble its cinematic counterpoint.
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2022 9:08 pm
by Monterey Jack
I'm not the only one who sees it, right...?
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2022 11:42 am
by John Johnson
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2022 8:57 pm
by Monterey Jack
The Mill Creek reissue of
The Black Dahlia...
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 1:06 pm
by AndyDursin
That's some terrible Photoshop at play there. I can't fathom why they do that, unless it's a situation where it's cheaper for them to create some new junk on the computer than pay a license for pre-existing artwork.
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2022 4:52 pm
by Monterey Jack
AndyDursin wrote: ↑Fri Apr 29, 2022 1:06 pm
That's some terrible Photoshop at play there. I can't fathom why they do that, unless it's a situation where it's cheaper for them to create some new junk on the computer than pay a license for pre-existing artwork.
And it's not like the original Universal disc - with the theatrical poster on the cover - isn't cheap and readily available on Amazon. Plus, this being a Mill creek reissue, it'll probably have a weaker transfer and zero extras, so I have no idea why it's being reissued.
Unless the film gets a 4K release (preferably with De Palma's rumored three-hour cut), the old Blu is more than sufficient.
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 1:00 pm
by AndyDursin
Don't know why, but this UNTOUCHABLES cover art (you linked to it last page MJ) just ANNOYS me. It looks even worse in-hand, the photoshopping is just atrocious, and the UNTOUCHABLES font itself looks cheap. Really bad job by Paramount.
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Wed May 25, 2022 1:22 pm
by John Johnson
Nice to see they have changed the artwork for the 4K release.
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 10:29 am
by Monterey Jack
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 10:53 am
by AndyDursin
Re: The Horrible Cover Art Thread
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 10:56 am
by Monterey Jack
Thankfully it's just the steelbook...the regular UHD should have an approximation of the iconic theatrical art.