AndyDursin wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2019 10:24 am
I think after getting canned by DC he's basically
had to go back and do something "modest".
I don't think that's a bad thing at all. Too many directors, once they get a taste of luxe, megabudget filmmaking, rarely or never go back to the kind of small, intimate films they cut their teeth on at the beginning of their careers. After the first
X-Men, Bryan Singer's only "small"/non-FX movies were
Valkyrie and
Bohemian Rhapsody. After the first
Spider-Man the only return to Sam Raimi's low-budget roots was
Drag Me To Hell (which was followed up by the all-greenscreen
Oz The Great & Powerful). The Wachowskis started off GREAT with the tense, sexy and witty
Bound (which cost like five million bucks), but once
The Matrix hit big, they never again did anything without a $150 million budget and gobs of overblown pretention.

I wish more established directors would mix it up and take on movies where they
don't have that cushion of gigantic studio money to fall back on instead of low-budget ingenuity. I kind of love it that Rian Johnson's first post-
Star Wars gig is the modest noir thriller
Knives Out (with a killer cast). How cool would it be to see Spielberg make something akin to
The Sugarland Express again?