I am simply speculating it's a condition of sale. I never said once there is evidence of it -- just my own personal thought because these corporations really don't want to not make money, and yet they are opting here not to exploit the market. I definitely disagree there isn't enough of an audience for these. Totally disagree. This is STAR WARS, a franchise that makes $600 million+ domestic on new installments that suck simply because of the brand name. This isn't a new Special Edition of BRIDESMAIDS (and I can't even count how many second and third releases we've gotten for movies that truly nobody cares about over the years). The fanbase is rabid and its mostly comprised of older fans who fork over handfuls for merchandise. They would absolutely buy proper releases of the theatrical versions if they were available -- and IMO they'd gladly spend 2X for a deluxe limited set if it came to that.I've seen no indication that George Lucas or anyone else put in a condition of sale that Disney never allow anyone to see the original versions of the Star Wars Trilogy. It looks to me that this is more of a fiscal thing with them - I don't believe they would want to issue the original versions as a separate release. The fans who want them are vocal, but the numbers simply aren't enough to justify a major expense by Disney. (It's not the massive number some fans think it to be.) I find it more likely that Disney will quietly have 2K scans done of the separation masters (if they haven't already done so) and they'll include those on a later edition as bonus features, much as Lucas did on the DVDs. These won't be huge restoration jobs - just 2K scans with whatever sound mix Disney wants to put on them, and they'll eventually be included in a big box set to get the fans to shell out yet again, now for all nine movies (so far).
No matter what way you want to spin it, though, I think it's been a clearly intentional move on Lucas' part -- BEFORE Disney bought Lucasfilm -- not to circulate the original versions in a format anyone would want to watch. You don't need to spend a nickel to create a 16:9 version of those prints -- forget 2K restorations, just simple HD masters would have sufficed -- but Lucas wouldn't even do that, and released one of the worst 4:3 transfers in the history of the DVD format on the second run of those STAR WARS discs. I mean those are the same transfers that graced the laserdiscs -- ancient non-anamorphic 4:3. That was all before the Disney sale too, which is why I think he truly wants the Special Editions to be the only ones in circulation mostly.
Where I do agree is that Disney is cheap, and they don't care about catalog titles in general. They don't give a damn about their back catalog and pass off most of that content on Blu-Ray now as "Disney Movie Club exclusives" where they just recycle their streaming HD masters and add nothing else. That's why, as a consumer, you have to dislike the thought of Disney buying the Fox library because they are singularly the worst studio in terms of wanting to do anything with their back catalog. They don't release anything "to retail" physically unless its a new release or a milestone animated offering...the sheer thought of them taking over Fox's back library is really depressing to a hardcore movie buff, because they almost certainly will do nothing with it.
And in general, in terms of fan-edits and the like -- I agree there too. There's a whole market of fan-edits, not in terms of restoring movies and footage cut for whatever reason, but also versions of films that remove humor, or subplots, simply because some guy doesn't like it. I really don't care about "Kevin From Chicago"'s edit of JUSTICE LEAGUE for example. That said -- I don't put this in the same category, and people have shown more love for these films than Lucas has given them, frankly.