Now THAT is surprising!Lots and lots of CGI. I would expect a 3D release as well.
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
So who is the "lead" in this movie -- the kids? Is Chris Pratt playing the Brolin villain then?
Now THAT is surprising!Lots and lots of CGI. I would expect a 3D release as well.
That's absolutely true but at least there were familiar, recognizable faces in the first Jurassic Park like Goldblum,Attenborough, Laura Dern, Sam Neill, etc. Nobody who would sell tickets by themselves but at least provide some veteran support to the story so it wasn't entirely being carried by FX. Certainly more recognizable than this movie, which has a cast that is almost no-name across the board for the large majority of viewers out there (I'm not sure anyone has ever cared about Bryce Dallas Howard's career, but she's essentially the biggest name attached -- and that doesn't say much, obviously -- with the exception of the actor you're not mentioning lol).But frankly, none of the Jurassic Park movies did that anyway. The movies have always been about the dinosaurs.
It sounds awful.AndyDursin wrote:Finally some plot elements have spilled out. Sounds like remnants of that (rightfully) aborted "military dino-man" script are working its way into this new story, with "trained good dinosaurs" taking on the bad ones.
http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusi ... dinos-more
Every entry in this series is exponentially worse that the previous installment. This one should earn a big, fat "F" at this rate.mkaroly wrote:It sounds awful.