Firing this back up in lieu of the new movie's release in a couple of weeks.
Because it was $15 (and selling off the digital copy brought it down to about $7!), I picked up the 4K UHD of the '98 GODZILLA, which I hadn't sat through in a while. The transfer and soundtrack on this disc are spectacular, so from a technical perspective I'm happy I picked it up. Yet time hasn't improved this movie. Yeah, I liked it at the time, I don't entirely hate it now, and certainly it's watchable in terms of the creature sequences and set-pieces. The issue is that there aren't enough of them -- there's just way too many silly characters, treated too lightheartedly. It's like all the worst elements of INDEPENDENCE DAY amplified, though truth be told, there really aren't that many differences between the two films tonally.
The casting is a big problem, though admittedly, with the script and tone being so broadly played, there's not a lot that could've been done there. Jean Reno is the only element of this movie that really worked at all, but in a movie where nearly
everyone is the comic relief, it's not as effective as it should've been. Broderick plays it too broadly. Hank Azaria strains to convey being a stereotypical "New Yorker". The Siskel & Ebert portrayal is ridiculous. And Maria Pitillo really is awful -- totally unappealing in a career-sinking performance.
The largest problem of all? It's not Godzilla. It looks like Draco from DRAGONHEART. It doesn't act like Godzilla, it doesn't look like Godzilla...if this movie was just about some mutated creature running around, it's possible it wouldn't have been as derided. Certainly wouldn't have had to carry around the baggage of the name. Yet, Emmerich and Devlin seem to have no idea what Godzilla is -- or were disinterested in making a "Godzilla movie." Hence the switch to a JURASSIC PARK ripoff with the raptors...sorry, baby Godzillas...running around in the second half, or having the monster lay eggs in general. Yet, with the two of them having all kinds of power after ID4's success, Sony gave them carte blanche to do whatever they wanted -- and this was the result.
There are some fun scenes with those little monsters, but this is more like a comical KING KONG, chock full of product placement and repetitive dumb dialogue. And the ending? Did it need to be that sad, especially given the material and the comical tone of the film? Whats odd is you can see where a sequel would have gone -- with Broderick raising one of the little Godzillas as a good guy, which is what they did in the animated follow-up series -- and that plot probably would've been far more palatable for kids if not audiences in general.
I'll also admit something else this time around: I don't like David Arnold's score for this film. The movie is overscored with far too many triumphant horn flourishes, especially in the first hour. The thematic material is pretty thin, and in general, it reminded me of one of those "John Debney '90s specials" where some listeners got all hot and bothered because they were hearing a big symphonic score -- but didn't care what the notes were. It's way too much and tires you out.
It's probably more like a 5.5/10 for me now, so thumbs down on my review from 1998!
