AndyDursin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 29, 2020 11:13 am"Critics" are mostly now like "reporters" in the current media: they serve a purpose for advocacy. Something like this triggers them. Something like a typical Disney or Marvel movie with "diversity," they stand up and applaud. Like how BLACK PANTHER is as groundbreaking a cinematic milestone as CITIZEN KANE. I'd be funny if it weren't so sad -- and transparent.
Re-watching
Doctor Sleep again recently, it struck me how the role of the young girl "Abra" was white in King's novel, yet black in the movie (with black dad/white mom parents, to boot), and while it certainly didn't "matter" from a narrative standpoint, it
does irk me how you can swap a Caucasian character out for a Black/Latino/Asian/Whatever one, and critics will beam at how "diverse" and color-blind the new cinematic landscape has become, yet if you took a character who was specifically Black/Latino/Asian/Whatever in the source material being adapted, and swapped them out for a Caucasian one, you'd get raked over the coals for "whitewashing".

The door should swing both ways for a
truly "diverse" Hollywood. I, for one, am sick of established white characters being swapped out for different ethnicity, when the movies could just create a
new character who is black, Asian, Latino, whatever. I don't want to see James Bond become black, Asian, a woman, or a transgender Whatever in a wheelchair in the next recasting of the role. That might make me a racist/sexist/transphobic, backwards-thinking dinosaur, but I've had it.
