Captain America? Phuck no!
- Monterey Jack
- Posts: 10542
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
- Location: Walpole, MA
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
"We have the latest rough cut of Captain America: The Search For A New Subtitle for review...!"
- AndyDursin
- Posts: 35757
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:45 pm
- Location: RI
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
I can't even imagine what the budget will end up being -- this wasn't 1 or 2 days of reshoots, this was WEEKS and it's the 2nd or 3rd time they've had to do it. Hiring new actors, dumping story lines...Doomcock was right, AGAIN!
- Monterey Jack
- Posts: 10542
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
- Location: Walpole, MA
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
If it's anything less than $400 million, I would be surprised (not even counting marketing costs), meaning it would have to make like $1.5 billion to eke out a miniscule profit, and that's clearly not going to happen. This might be THE breaking point for the MCU. The fact that they haven't been able to crack something as relatively simple as a Blade movie (they cast Mahershala Ali in the title role FIVE YEARS ago, meaning pre-Pandemic!AndyDursin wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2024 10:29 pm I can't even imagine what the budget will end up being -- this wasn't 1 or 2 days of reshoots, this was WEEKS and it's the 2nd or 3rd time they've had to do it. Hiring new actors, dumping story lines...Doomcock was right, AGAIN!


The fact that a movie that's supposed to open in eight months (ha!) hasn't had a single trailer cut for it yet proves just how little of what's been shot (and reshot. And RE-REshot...) is even coherent at this point.
Last edited by Monterey Jack on Fri Jul 12, 2024 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- AndyDursin
- Posts: 35757
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:45 pm
- Location: RI
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
Doomcock right AGAIN!!
- Monterey Jack
- Posts: 10542
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
- Location: Walpole, MA
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
Disney investors be like --


- Monterey Jack
- Posts: 10542
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
- Location: Walpole, MA
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
How many reshoots before they push the release date back again?

- AndyDursin
- Posts: 35757
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:45 pm
- Location: RI
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
Anyone who pays to see this is part of the problem. Don't support this garbage Di$ney crap.
- Monterey Jack
- Posts: 10542
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
- Location: Walpole, MA
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
You're a vile racist if you don't see this, Andy.AndyDursin wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 11:21 am Anyone who pays to see this is part of the problem. Don't support this garbage Di$ney crap.

- AndyDursin
- Posts: 35757
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:45 pm
- Location: RI
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
Don't forget a sexist!
It's going to be highly amusing when all the uninformed masses who go see DEADPOOL think "Marvel is back!" without realizing this has been on the shelf and reshot nearly a handful of times.
It's going to be highly amusing when all the uninformed masses who go see DEADPOOL think "Marvel is back!" without realizing this has been on the shelf and reshot nearly a handful of times.
- Monterey Jack
- Posts: 10542
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
- Location: Walpole, MA
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
Now it appears they're recutting and reshooting AGAIN to excise an assassination attempt.

- Monterey Jack
- Posts: 10542
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
- Location: Walpole, MA
- Edmund Kattak
- Posts: 1824
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:08 pm
- Location: Northern New Jersey
- Contact:
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
I would think you'd have to be because it defies common sense. Then again, there is a tease in that trailer with Ross telling Sam "You are not Steve Rodgers. Perhaps in typical Marvel fashion, more is going on here. At least this trailer looked more interesting than the previous one.
But I ask the question: Did it really have to take 4 major reshoots and probably almost half a billion dollars to get to this point? Is this the "tentpole" filmmaking process now for Disney?
I think I appreciated it more when it was fake mechanical sharks with audio/visual sensibilities and craftsmanship of the filmmakers to make it work.
But I ask the question: Did it really have to take 4 major reshoots and probably almost half a billion dollars to get to this point? Is this the "tentpole" filmmaking process now for Disney?
I think I appreciated it more when it was fake mechanical sharks with audio/visual sensibilities and craftsmanship of the filmmakers to make it work.
Indeed,
Ed
Ed
- Monterey Jack
- Posts: 10542
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
- Location: Walpole, MA
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
That's the whole problem...it didn't.Edmund Kattak wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 7:06 am But I ask the question: Did it really have to take 4 major reshoots and probably almost half a billion dollars to get to this point? Is this the "tentpole" filmmaking process now for Disney?


Then again, the recent D+ series Agatha All Along was made for a reasonable $40 million, as opposed to the $225 mil(!) that She-Hulk or Secret Invasion cost, so maybe Disney is beginning to be more frugal, and it's long past time.
- Monterey Jack
- Posts: 10542
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
- Location: Walpole, MA
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
What the hell.


- AndyDursin
- Posts: 35757
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:45 pm
- Location: RI
Re: Captain America? Phuck no!
Horrendous lol. So too is this: