
"I've won my Oscar, now, back to whoring myself out again for another decade!"

It's literally the scene where Deadpool digs up Logan's dessicated corpse and uses his Adamantium bones as weapons to kill a bunch of people. That's the level of respect this casting has.AndyDursin wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2024 10:36 pm
Having a guy establish himself as THE signature hero in this series then come back as a bad guy IN THE VERY NEXT AVENGERS SEQUEL cheapens what he's established. Not to mention reeks of desperation on both sides.
I think Kirby is stunning, but Sue Storm should be more of a bubbly, girl-next door, just-out-of-her-teens type, a female equivalent of Chris Evans in the 2000s FF movies (which sucked, but he was the only member of the ensemble who really understood the assignment and wasn't horribly miscast). Hell, if she weren't too old, someone like a less-snotty Maggie Grace (circa the first season of Lost) would have been good. Pascal is awful casting, smacking of the same genre recycling that's infected too much geek cinema since the early 2000s (remember when Hugo Weaving was in EVERYTHING?AndyDursin wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2024 10:54 pm I think the Fantastic Four casting is just bad. Pascal is really not the first choice a fan would have for that part but I can see him maybe working out. But Vanessa Kirby I just am not into at all. She's more creepy than sexy and is kind of odd looking.
A simple, meat & potatoes superhero movie like Darkman, The Crow or The Rocketeer would not be made today...or if they were, they'd be choked with fanservice cameos, callbacks and Easter Eggs, and the ostensible title character would barely have anything to do.AndyDursin wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2024 11:25 pm The super hero movies with individual characters and presumably more human driven stories than these "apocalypse tonight!" efforts have fallen by the wayside. Really ever since Disney decided to make Captain America Civil War a defacto Avengers movie, it's never been the same.
Be like casting Daniel Craig as the villain in the next James Bond movie (wait, he almost tanked the franchise, so maybe ideal casting!AndyDursin wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2024 11:46 pm And Disney has not hired big stars in most of these films -- either that or the villain is always boring. Downey is really the first BIG star they've brought in as a villain in a while-- and I don't blame them for casting a big star but HIM? It'd be like Christopher Reeve playing The Joker!
For Downey, who helped catapult Marvel into a money-printing machine thanks to his turn as Tony Stark in the first “Iron Man” film in 2008, his deal also is filled with perks that include private jet travel, dedicated security and a whole “trailer encampment” for the newly minted Oscar winner. (Downey took home this year’s best supporting actor honors for his role in “Oppenheimer.”)
According to one knowledgeable source, Downey is by far the highest-paid member of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and has pulled down between $500 million and $600 million over the course of four “Avengers” movies, three “Iron Man” outings and cameos in “The Incredible Hulk,” “Captain America: Civil War” and “Spider-Man: Homecoming.”
Sources say Downey, who is repped by WME, agreed to return to the MCU if the Russos, who are CAA clients, would be directing. “They were the only ones he would work with,” says a source familiar with the dealmaking.
"The future, Mister Dursin! The future...!"AndyDursin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 11:30 pm Seriously -- why does he need all this money? And why does he want to keep making this crap?
He's got all this cash he can do whatever he wants with -- and he wants a "trailer encampment" so he can make more of this trash?