R.I.P. Michael Chapman

Talk about the latest movies and video releases here!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Monterey Jack
Posts: 10568
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
Location: Walpole, MA

R.I.P. Michael Chapman

#1 Post by Monterey Jack »

https://variety.com/2020/film/people-ne ... 234778398/

Terrific cinematographer, from Taxi Driver to Raging Bull to Philip Kaufman's remake of Invasion Of The Body Snatchers (a superbly-shot film) to The Fugitive.

User avatar
Paul MacLean
Posts: 7542
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: New York

Re: R.I.P. Michael Chapman

#2 Post by Paul MacLean »

Monterey Jack wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 9:56 pm https://variety.com/2020/film/people-ne ... 234778398/

Terrific cinematographer, from Taxi Driver to Raging Bull to Philip Kaufman's remake of Invasion Of The Body Snatchers (a superbly-shot film) to The Fugitive.
Sad news, but what a mark he made in the profession.

I was struck by his comment 'Visual splendor can be “a terrible mistake,” he told Variety...“It shouldn’t be beautiful — it should be appropriate.'" That's an age-old controversy, not unlike the argument "music should be felt not heard".



Sad day for the business though, considering we also lost Ron Cobb.

User avatar
AndyDursin
Posts: 35792
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:45 pm
Location: RI

Re: R.I.P. Michael Chapman

#3 Post by AndyDursin »

Great cinematographer -- sure it's sad, but that's a full life and a brilliant career.

These passings also highlight how artists like Chapman haven't been replaced over the last few decades. Who's going to be bemoaning the cinematographers of today 30 or 40 years from now? Sure, there's Roger Deakins and...Roger Deakins...and...

The art form isn't what it once was, I don't know how you argue any other way.

User avatar
Monterey Jack
Posts: 10568
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:14 am
Location: Walpole, MA

Re: R.I.P. Michael Chapman

#4 Post by Monterey Jack »

AndyDursin wrote: Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:49 am These passings also highlight how artists like Chapman haven't been replaced over the last few decades. Who's going to be bemoaning the cinematographers of today 30 or 40 years from now? Sure, there's Roger Deakins and...Roger Deakins...and...

The art form isn't what it once was, I don't know how you argue any other way.
It's the same thing with all behind-the-scenes film craftspeople, from cinematographers to composers to F/X artists...a steady "blandification" of cinema. :| As little as a quarter-century ago, you could see a movie with a melodic, theme-driven musical score, colorful, beautifully-grainy cinematography and special effects that were truly special. Now, every movie looks and sounds the same, with the advent of digital camera systems squashing the spontaneity of get-it-on-the-fly photography in the era when movies were shot on actual celluloid. When I started getting heavily into movies around the beginning of the 90's, I began to notice the particular "look" of a movie shot by Chapman, or Conrad L. Hall, or Dean Cundey, whoever, and began to really study the block o' text at the bottom of movie posters, not just to see who was directing or starring, but also the heads of the various tech departments, from cinematography to music to the makeup people. Now, now matter who's working on a movie's lighting, it all looks the same, harsh, flat and eerily smooth. Look at Martin Scorsese's The Irishman compared to his previous films...despite the services of a top-notch DP (Rodrigo Prieto), it had that antiseptic "Netflix Sheen" that all streaming movies and shows have these days.

Post Reply